News

SHA sends Package 4 requests to the Hill Leadership

May 8, 2020 - Published in News Releases and Advocacy,Uncategorized

Today, Harvesters sent their requests for additional aid in the next stimulus package. As Members of Congress continue their negotiations for the next stimulus bill, we request they include aid for the commercial fishing industry.

You can find a PDF of the letter here.

 

May 8, 2020

 

The Honorable Nancy Pelosi                                                      The Honorable Mitch McConnell

Speaker of the House                                                                 Majority Leader

U.S. House of Representatives                                                   U.S. Senate

Washington, DC 20515                                                                Washington, DC 20510

 

The Honorable Kevin McCarthy                                                The Honorable Chuck Schumer

Minority Leader                                                                          Minority Leader

U.S. House of Representatives                                                 U.S. Senate

Washington, DC 20515                                                             Washington, DC 20510

 

RE: U.S. Commercial Fishing Needs

 

Dear Leader McConnell, Leader Schumer, Speaker Pelosi, and Leader McCarthy,

We write today on behalf of our 18 member organizations and thousands of fishermen from Alaska to Maine. We are proud stewards and harvesters of America’s seafood, our nation’s strategic protein reserve and a critical component of our country’s food security, especially during this time. As our nation reels in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, we respectfully urge you to consider the following requests to ensure that the commercial fishing industry is able to continue providing a steady supply of fresh, sustainable seafood to our fellow Americans and support our coastal communities.

We are extremely grateful for the fisheries assistance included in the third COVID-19 stimulus package. As Congress turns its attention to crafting its next stimulus and recovery package, we look forward to the inclusion of additional relief for our industry. To mitigate the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our industry and businesses and ensure our continued ability to operate, we ask Congress to take the following actions:

  • Provide no less than an additional $1.5 billion to Sec. 12005, Assistance to Fishery Participants, of H.R. 748, the CARES Act, to provide relief from severe economic impacts felt by the commercial fishing industry as a result of COVID-19. This program is designed to provide assistance to commercial and charter fishery participants, as well as other fishery-related stakeholders, affected by COVID-19. While we are extremely grateful for the $300 million initially authorized and appropriated for this program, it is quickly becoming clear that as this money is divided among state and federal fisheries and a variety of user groups, it will not go far in addressing the losses we have felt in the commercial fishing industry. For perspective, commercial fishing landings at the port of New Bedford in 2018 were valued at $431 million, nearly one and a half times the amount of money included in the first appropriation for this assistance fund. We respectfully ask for additional funding for this critically important program that will provide direct relief to fishermen and our associated coastal communities.

 

  • Ensure the protection of critical working waterfront infrastructure by providing no less than $500 million in funding to states through the grant and loan programs established in H.R. 3596, Keep America’s Waterfronts Working As many commercial fishermen and waterfront businesses are making tough decisions about which bills to pay and whether to close their businesses for good, we respectfully urge Congress to provide the resources to fund the grant and loan program outlined in H.R. 3596. This bill, which enjoys bipartisan sponsorship and has passed the House, establishes a Working Waterfront Grant Program to provide matching, competitive grants to coastal states to help preserve and expand access to coastal waters for water-dependent businesses. It also creates a loan program for waterfront preservation, modeled after state drinking water loans. The commercial fishing industry has rightly been deemed an essential business because of the role we play in our nation’s food security, but in order for our businesses to continue and thrive, we must maintain our access to critical working waterfront infrastructure, including boat docks, fuel docks, ice houses, and fish houses, among others. We are concerned that if the commercial fishing industry and other water-dependent businesses shutter due to COVID-19, waterfront property previously used for industrial purposes will be developed and turned into residential or tourist areas, effectively shutting us out of ever accessing it again. By establishing these grant and loan programs, and funding them at a level no less than $500 million, Congress will ensure our ability to maintain our waterfront access that is critical for our business operations.

 

  • Provide no less than $2 billion for USDA to purchase domestically harvested and processed seafood products. Because COVID-19 forced many restaurants and other food service outlets to close in an effort to slow the spread of the virus, the commercial fishing industry and associated supply chain businesses have been severely impacted. In fact, in 2017, nearly 70% of the money spent on seafood in the U.S. was spent on seafood consumed at restaurants, cafeterias, and through catering services.[1] While many other sectors of food production have seen targeted support and dollars allocated specifically for USDA purchases, seafood has largely been left out of the picture. We simply ask for USDA funding specifically directed at purchasing seafood products, including those that have not historically been purchased by USDA, to help offset the severe impacts our industry has shouldered due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

  • Provide oversight of NMFS Observer Program during the COVID-19 pandemic. We are increasingly concerned about the inconsistent way the NMFS Regional Offices have issued waivers for observer requirements. On March 27th, NMFS published a notice in the Federal Register requesting comments on a temporary rule providing Regional Offices and Science Centers the ability to grant waivers for observer requirements. Comments on this rule overwhelmingly support extended waivers for observer requirements. While some regions have provided temporary waivers pending a final decision, some Regional Offices have allowed those waivers to expire, often without justification, forcing fishing vessels to again take human observers on their vessels as the virus continues to spread around the country. This haphazard patchwork of observer requirements and waivers appears to be inconsistent with the current reality across the country and disregards the risk to human lives. It is especially appalling that fishing vessels are required to take human observers on fishing trips – potentially exposing captains and crew to COVID – when NMFS has repeatedly delayed and cancelled its own scientific research and surveys due to exposure risk for their staff and scientists.

 

We understand there are many competing requests flooding your mailboxes during this time; however, we ask you and your colleagues in Congress to support us in ensuring our businesses can survive the COVID-19 pandemic and protecting the health of our captains, crew, and shoreside communities. The country’s access to seafood depends on it.

 

Respectfully,

Robert Dooley                                                  Leigh Habegger

President                                                          Executive Director

 

Alaska Bering Sea Crabbers • Alaska Whitefish Trawlers Association • Cape Cod Commercial Fishermen’s Alliance • Cordova District Fishermen United • Fishermen’s Marketing Association • Fishing Vessel Owners’ Association • Fort Bragg Groundfish Association • Georges Bank Cod Fixed Gear Sector • Gulf Fishermen’s Association • Gulf of Mexico Reef Fish Shareholders’ Alliance • Maine Coast Fishermen’s Association • Midwater Trawlers Cooperative • New Hampshire Community Seafood • North Pacific Fisheries Association • Purse Seine Vessel Owners’ Association • Rhode Island Commercial Fishermen’s Association • South Atlantic Fishermen’s Association • United Catcher Boats

[1] 2017 NOAA Fisheries of the United States Report https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/document/fisheries-united-states-2017-report

Harvesters send letter asking Treasury to address F/V crew member issues in PPP loans

May 7, 2020 - Published in News Releases and Advocacy,Uncategorized

Today, Harvesters sent the letter below to Senate and House Small Business Committees seeking their assistance to clarify an issue facing the fishing industry as we apply for PPP loans due to specific language in the IRS Code.

You can find a PDF of the letter here.

 

May 7, 2020

 

The Honorable Marco Rubio                                                      The Honorable Ben Cardin

Chairman                                                                                  Ranking Member

Small Business Committee                                                        Small Business Committee

U.S. Senate                                                                               U.S. Senate

Washington, DC 20510                                                             Washington, DC 20510

 

Dear Chairman Rubio and Ranking Member Cardin:

We write today on behalf of our 18 member organizations and thousands of fishermen from Alaska to Maine. We are proud stewards and harvesters of America’s seafood, our nation’s strategic protein reserve and a critical component of our country’s food security, especially during this time. As our fishing businesses reel in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, we respectfully ask you to address the need to allow fishing businesses to include payments to fishing vessel crewmembers reported as fishing boat proceeds on Form 1099-MISC as eligible payroll costs under the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP).

We are grateful for the hard work and leadership you have both shown in developing programs to keep the nation’s small business community afloat and able to weather this pandemic, fishing businesses included. We believe it was an oversight that fishing vessel crewmember wages cannot be considered in the fishing business’s PPP loan application as submitted by the vessel owner or captain, and hope it can be easily fixed as Treasury completes their final rule for the PPP.

Our businesses have been deemed essential to the food security of the nation and we are proud to go to sea especially in this time of need. However, we have seen drastic price reductions for much of our fresh product and we are landing a fraction of what we normally land this time of year because there is simply no market in which to sell fresh fish. We believe the purpose and intent of the Paycheck Protection Program is to help protect small businesses, including commercial fishing businesses. But as it stands now, that does not hold true and fishing businesses and crewmembers are unable to effectively access full PPP benefits.

Allowing a fishing business to include crewmember 1099 income on its PPP loan application will reduce administrative burden and allow crewmembers and fishing businesses to realize the full benefits of this program. One fishing vessels operating as a small business could have anywhere from two to over 20 crewmembers for the relevant PPP loan time period. Many of those crewmembers may not have existing business bank accounts at lending institutions, and many banks are currently overwhelmed and limiting PPP loans to only existing business customers. Enabling a fishing business to include crewmembers will allow PPP benefits to flow to the appropriate people and reduce the number of applications lenders will have to process.

The IRS Fishing Audit Technique Guide (Revised 2011) notes that under standard common law rules, individuals who work on fishing vessels as crewmembers are considered employees except under IRC § 3121(b)(20) where these crewmembers are considered self-employed for the purposes of health insurance, pension plans, and employment taxes. Indeed, this is evident as crewmembers purchase their own health insurance, set up their own retirement accounts, and must report any fishing boat proceeds on their 1099-MISC form in box 5.

In order for our businesses to find relief and access immediately available capital to help us continue to pay our full crew their wages, we ask for your help to work with the Treasury Department to allow fishing businesses to report fishing boat proceeds (crewmember wages) on Form 1099-MISC as eligible payroll costs under the Payroll Protection Program. We ask that you pursue the necessary rulemaking changes or if necessary, legislative changes to Section 1102 of the CARES Act, to address this problem for our Nation’s commercial fishing businesses.

We appreciate your leadership and work to address this issue and we stand ready to help your efforts in any way.

 

Respectfully,

Robert Dooley                                                  Leigh Habegger

President                                                          Executive Director

 

Alaska Bering Sea Crabbers • Alaska Whitefish Trawlers Association • Cape Cod Commercial Fishermen’s Alliance • Cordova District Fishermen United • Fishermen’s Marketing Association • Fishing Vessel Owners’ Association • Fort Bragg Groundfish Association • Georges Bank Cod Fixed Gear Sector • Gulf Fishermen’s Association • Gulf of Mexico Reef Fish Shareholders’ Alliance • Maine Coast Fishermen’s Association • Midwater Trawlers Cooperative • New Hampshire Community Seafood • North Pacific Fisheries Association • Purse Seine Vessel Owners’ Association • Rhode Island Commercial Fishermen’s Association • South Atlantic Fishermen’s Association • United Catcher Boats

Harvesters letter to NOAA regarding $300 million in fisheries assistance Funds

April 23, 2020 - Published in News Releases and Advocacy,Uncategorized

On Thursday, April 23, Harvesters sent a letter to Secretary Ross, Paul Doremus, and Chris Oliver requesting that the process to disburse the $300 million in fisheries assistance funds be public and transparent so that the commercial fishing industry can engage appropriately and understand how to apply for funds. Additionally, we asked that once this process is established, funds should be disbursed quickly. Lastly, we noted that additional funds will likely be necessary to support the commercial fishing industry.

You can read the full letter below and a PDF version can be found here.

 

April 23, 2020

 

The Honorable Wilbur Ross

Secretary

U.S. Department of Commerce

1401 Constitution Avenue NW

Washington, D.C. 20230

 

Dear Secretary Ross,

We write today on behalf of our 18 member groups and thousands of fishermen from Alaska to Maine. We are proud stewards and harvesters of America’s seafood, a critical component of our country’s food security, especially during this time. As our nation reels in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, we continue to work hard providing fresh and frozen fish to consumers. However, drastic supply chain disruptions resulting from restaurant closures and limited or no grocery markets for fresh fish has inflicted staggering economic losses for the commercial fishing industry. We call upon the Department of Commerce and NOAA to clearly articulate their distribution process for the $300 million in fisheries assistance funds to ensure it is public and transparent. We also request the funds be expeditiously disbursed to the eligible recipients once this process is developed.

We strongly urge NOAA and the Department of Commerce to make the disbursement process for the $300 million in fisheries assistance public and transparent. The industry has not, thus far, been made aware of any process NOAA is considering to allocate these funds despite repeated requests from industry stakeholders and Members of Congress. We are concerned that this lack of transparency will result in a process that does not adequately account for fishermen’s economic needs.

Once this process has been outlined, we urge Agency and Commerce officials to disburse these funds as quickly as possible. Many of the domestic and international markets commercial fishermen depend on for the sale of their catch have been drastically reduced or have disappeared altogether. Approximately 70% of the money spent on seafood in 2017 in the United States was spent on seafood consumed at restaurants, cafeterias, and through catering services.[1] As these businesses have shuttered, our fishing businesses have also suffered. The U.S. is a global leader in sustainable seafood, but without an immediate lifeline, we risk losing the fishermen, the fishing businesses, and the associated working waterfronts that have made our commercial fishing industry the gold standard. Furthermore, the commercial fishing industry is the economic backbone in many coastal communities and without a strong fishing industry, many of these coastal communities will face enormous financial challenges. It is imperative this money reach qualified recipients quickly.

As the economic impacts of this pandemic continue to mount, access to capital to keep the lights on and the boats running is critical. The $300 million appropriated in the CARES Act is only the start to helping the commercial fishing industry stay afloat during this pandemic and continue to supply fresh, sustainable seafood for the American people. Any future dollars appropriated will need to be quickly disbursed to the fishing industry, which is why the process you set forth in this initial round is so important.

We strongly urge the Department of Commerce and NOAA to provide transparency in the development of the process to allocate the $300 million in fisheries assistance so that the commercial fishing industry can understand how to appropriately access those funds. Getting this process correct will allow for the subsequent disbursement of funds to happen efficiently now and with any additional funding appropriated in the future.

Thank you for your consideration.

 

Respectfully,

Leigh Habegger                                                Robert Dooley

Executive Director                                            President

 

 

Cc:      Paul Doremus, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Operations

Chris Oliver, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries

 

[1] 2017 NOAA Fisheries of the United States Report https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/document/fisheries-united-states-2017-report

Harvesters pen letter to NMFS leadership addressing the Observer Program requirements amid COVID-19 pandemic

April 4, 2020 - Published in News Releases and Advocacy

On Friday, April 3, 2020, Harvesters sent the following letter to NMFS leadership including Chris Oliver and Sam Rauch, as well as each Regional Administrator, outlining our serious concerns for the health and human safety of our captains, crew, and shoreside communities as regional offices have been slow to issue exemption waivers for Observer Program requirements.

 

April 3, 2020

 

Mr. Chris Oliver                                                           Mr. Samuel Rauch

Assistant Administrator for Fisheries                         Deputy Asst Administrator for Regulatory Programs

National Marine Fisheries Service                             National Marine Fisheries Service

1315 East-West Highway                                           1315 East-West Highway

Silver Spring, MD 20610                                            Silver Spring, MD 20610

 

Mr. Oliver and Mr. Rauch,

We write today on behalf of our 18 member groups and thousands of fishermen from Alaska to Maine. We are proud stewards and harvesters of America’s seafood, our nation’s strategic protein reserve and a critical component of our country’s food security, especially during this time. As our nation reels in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, we continue to go to sea to harvest and land seafood for American consumers. In light of the enormous health and safety risks associated with taking an observer onboard our fishing trips, we respectfully and strongly urge each Regional Administrator to waive observer requirements until June 30, 2020 or the end of fishing seasons underway at that time, whichever is later, for their regions consistent with the agency’s emergency rule and the authority granted to them under 50 CFR 648.11(c).

The emergency action taken by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) on March 24, 2020 grants each Regional Administrator the authority to waive observer requirements on a “case-by-case” basis. Unfortunately, this process is too time consuming and wastes Agency resources that should be devoted to more pressing tasks. Furthermore, the “case-by-case” work in the West Coast office has developed into a vessel-by-vessel decision, a herculean task for regional staff, no doubt.

We respectfully and strongly urge NMFS Headquarters to work with each Regional Administrator (RA) to craft a blanket waiver similar to the one issued by Michael Pentony, RA for the Greater Atlantic Fisheries Region Office (GARFO). The blanket waiver issued for the Greater Atlantic Region removes the risk to our captains, skippers, crew, and shoreside communities in that region from being exposed to COVID-19 through an observer whose recent activities, actions, and health status are unknown. We believe it is irresponsible to continue requiring our fishing fleets to carry observers given the risks to health and human safety.

We urge you to use this opportunity to take full advantage of the many electronic monitoring (EM) pilot programs around the country to gather catch data during this time when human observers should not be used, and to expand the use of EM systems where possible. Investment in the continued development of EM systems around the country and a concerted effort to incorporate EM data into the stream of catch data will likely have a profound effect on NMFS’s ability to continue to collect the important catch data necessary to aid fisheries management during this period. With respect to the current ongoing EM EFP projects, we ask you to consider allowing additional vessels to become participants in these EM EFP projects if camera EM systems are available and the additional vessels meet the requirements of the EFP. We are strong supporters of EM systems and believe we have a great opportunity to work to advance these systems given the present challenges with human observers.

While we stand firmly behind our belief in accountability and fully support the Agency’s work to gather important fishery data, this is not an issue of data or science. Many of our boats are designed such that maintaining six feet of distance while working is simply not possible. Additionally, crew sleeping quarters are, on nearly every boat, very small and observers may be sleeping less than 3 feet from other crew members. Many of our vessels are home ported in and/or offload in small, remote communities and observers pose additional risks to those communities who lack the medical resources and expertise that larger cities enjoy. Our industry is taking drastic strides to protect our captains and crew from exposure to COVID-19 including 14-day quarantines and remaining on the vessel through the fishing season (i.e. not disembarking the vessel when at the docks or offloading). Allowing observers on our boats will undermine our efforts to protect the health and safety of our captains, crew, and shoreside communities.

We ask NMFS and the Regional Administrators to support us in protecting our fishermen by waiving observer requirements until June 30, 2020 or the end of fishing seasons underway at that time, whichever is later, so we can continue to provide fresh, sustainable seafood in this time of need.

 

Respectfully,

Leigh Habegger                                              Robert Dooley

Executive Director                                          President

 

Alaska Bering Sea Crabbers • Alaska Whitefish Trawlers Association • Cape Cod Commercial Fishermen’s Alliance • Cordova District Fishermen United • Fishermen’s Marketing Association • Fishing Vessel Owners’ Association • Fort Bragg Groundfish Association • Georges Bank Cod Fixed Gear Sector • Gulf Fishermen’s Association • Gulf of Mexico Reef Fish Shareholders’ Alliance • Maine Coast Fishermen’s Association • Midwater Trawlers Cooperative • New Hampshire Community Seafood • North Pacific Fisheries Association • Purse Seine Vessel Owners’ Association • Rhode Island Commercial Fishermen’s Association • South Atlantic Fishermen’s Association • United Catch Boats

 

CC:      James Balsiger, PhD, Regional Administrator, Alaska Regional Office

Michael Pentony, Regional Administrator, Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office

Michael Tosatto, Regional Administrator, Pacific Islands Regional Office

Roy Crabtree, PhD, Southeast Regional Office

Barry Thom, West Coast Regional Office

 

You can view a PDF of this letter here.

Seafood Harvesters applauds passage of the third Senate stimulus package

March 26, 2020 - Published in News Releases and Advocacy

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Media Contact: Leigh Habegger, leigh@seafoodharvesters.org, (703) 794-5114

 

Seafood Harvesters applauds passage of the third Senate stimulus package

Stimulus package includes funds to help fishing industry thanks to Senators’ efforts

 

WASHINGTON, DC, March 25, 2020 – Early this morning, the Senate passed the CARES Act, which includes a number of important provisions to provide relief to U.S. citizens and small businesses. We applaud the Senate for its work and urge the House to swiftly pass this legislation.

We are grateful for the efforts of Senators Cantwell, Collins, Markey, Murkowski, and Sullivan to champion the needs of the fishing industry in this stimulus package. Their strong work on behalf of our industry will prove immensely helpful in the coming weeks and months as we work to recover from COVID-19 impacts.

Included in this package is language that provides $300 million in fisheries assistance to support the fishing industry. This funding is critical to helping keep commercial fishermen afloat as their businesses are severely impacted by COVID-19.

Additionally, there is language providing more than $350 billion in loans for small businesses, under which commercial fishermen qualify, and we are glad to see funds provided to alleviate COVID-19 related impacts for our businesses, many of which are family run operations.

“This bill provides urgently needed support for the fishing industry and we are grateful for the work by these Senators to champion our industry’s needs,” said Leigh Habegger, Executive Director for Seafood Harvesters of America. “The impacts from COVID-19 are severe and widespread across the seafood industry and we look forward to these disaster funds being quickly disbursed to help offset the financial hits we have experienced and will continue to incur.”

Seafood Harvesters of America represents 18 fishing organizations from the Bering Sea to the Gulf of Mexico to Maine. Find more at www.seafoodharvesters.org

###

 

PDF can be found here.

Harvesters Statement on the Passing of Vice President William Ward

December 18, 2019 - Published in News Clippings

The Seafood Harvesters of America extend our deepest sympathies to the family of William Ward who suddenly passed away on Friday night. With a long history in the commercial fishing industry, Will selflessly served our organization as a board member representing the Gulf Fishermen’s Association and we are grateful for his devoted service.

As a lawyer, Will used his platform to conserve and protect the natural resources he loved and he worked to ensure fair and just treatment under the law for his clients. Outside of the courtroom, Will spent his time running his seafood business and advocating tirelessly for the commercial fishing industry in Florida and in Washington, DC.

As Vice President of the Harvesters’ Board of Directors, Will’s unique perspective and voice helped lead our organization on issues ranging from accountability to vessel safety to seafood promotion. He was a firm believer that every American should have access to the freshest, most sustainable seafood harvested in our nation’s waters and worked each day to protect that access. Will was, undoubtedly, a dedicated and passionate voice for our organization and for the industry across the country.

We are heartbroken to hear the news of Will’s passing and offer our heartfelt condolences to his family and friends.

 

Will holding up his bull red caught in Galveston, TX at our annual meeting in October.

Our Fall 2019 Newsletter

December 9, 2019 - Published in Newsletter

From continuing to defend the core principles in the MSA to Council meetings across the country to learning fisheries science to promoting wild caught seafood, we’ve been busy this year!

Click on the image below to download our latest newsletter and read about what we’ve been up to.

 

 

 

 

2019 Coast Guard Bill Comments

December 5, 2019 - Published in News Releases and Advocacy

Today, the Harvesters sent a letter to the Chairmen and Ranking Members of the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee and the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee conveying our support of a handful of provisions in the bill relevant to the commercial fishing industry. You can find the text of the letter below and a PDF of the letter here.

 

December 5, 2019

 

Chairman Roger Wicker                                                Chairman Peter DeFazio

Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation          House Transportation and Infrastructure

Committee                                                                    Committee

512 Dirksen Senate Office Building                               2165 Rayburn House Office Building

Washington, DC 20510                                                 Washington, DC 20515

 

Ranking Member Maria Cantwell                                  Ranking Member Sam Graves

Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation          House Transportation and Infrastructure

Committee                                                                    Committee

512 Dirksen Senate Office Building                               2165 Rayburn House Office Building

Washington, DC 2051                                                   Washington, DC 20515

 

 

Dear Chairman Wicker, Ranking Member Cantwell, Chairman DeFazio, and Ranking Member Sam Graves

The Seafood Harvesters of America is a broad-based organization that represents commercial fishermen around the country. Our members reflect the diversity of America’s coastal communities, the complexity of our marine environments, and the enormous potential of our commercial fisheries. As domestic harvesters of an American public resource, we recognize and embrace our stewardship responsibility and we advocate for strong accountability across all sectors.

We understand that the 2019 House and Senate Coast Guard Reauthorization bills, which contain provisions important to the commercial fishing industry, are soon to be conferenced. We urge the conference committee to accept the common sense measures found in both the House and Senate bills, and the FISH SAFE Act (HR 4719), that improve fishing vessel safety:

  • Exemptions from Alternate Safety Compliance Programs (ASCP) for fishing vessels less than 79’ in length (S. 2297, Section 303). This section removes the burden of developing an ASCP specific to smaller fishing vessels but maintains safety standards by requiring dockside examines every two years instead of five. We are concerned that the U.S. Coast Guard does not have adequate resources to develop appropriately tailored ASCPs as demonstrated by the failure to develop an ASCP in 2016. However, the U.S. Coast Guard already conducts dockside exams and has the staff qualified to conduct these important dockside exams. We appreciate the need for strict safety standards and believe those required by the Commercial Fishing Vessel Safety Act for dockside exams are sufficient to protect life at sea.
  • Maintaining current practice for the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) for fishing vessels 300GT+ (S. 2297, Section 423). This section simply codifies an existing exemption for specific GMDSS requirements that have been in place since 1999 for the commercial fishing vessels operating in Alaskan waters. This section, while removing the requirement for vessel to carry redundant and costly equipment that requires an additional licensed GMDSS operator onboard vessels, mandates that vessels still carry a suite of GMDSS equipment to ensure crew safety and maintain the ability to communicate with shoreside emergency response including: EPIRBS, wheelhouse transponders, and survival craft devices.
  • Use of AIS devices to mark fishing gear (S. 2297, Section 417). The use of AIS to mark fishing gear has become an increasingly attractive way for Alaskan fishermen to reduce gear conflicts and on-the-water accidents. The practice of using AIS to mark fishing gear is currently prohibited by the FCC and this language directs the U.S. Coast Guard to work with the FCC to consider regulations that would allow for this practice.
  • Restoring the federal share of the Fishing Safety Training Grants Program (S. 2297, Section 103; HR 4719). We appreciate the bicameral efforts to restore the federal share of the Fishing Safety Training Grants to 75 percent. This grant program is a critical source of funding to educate captains and crew on safety procedures that reduce fishing fatalities and injuries. Including this language in the conferenced Coast Guard bill would reduce the financial burdens on communities and organizations providing this valuable training and ensure their ability to continue providing it.

We applaud the strong bipartisan, bicameral work that has gone into crafting this bill. The result of this hard work is a bill that ensures the safety of our fishermen at sea while also enacting common sense laws. We support the provisions listed above and urge the conference committee to include them in the final bill.

On behalf of our 17 member groups and the thousands of fishermen we represent, I am deeply grateful to all the Senators and Representatives who have devoted their time and energy to this bill and look forward to it passing both chambers in short order.

 

Sincerely,

Leigh Habegger

Executive Director

Seafood Harvesters of America

 

Member Organizations

Alaska Bering Sea Crabbers – Alaska Whitefish Trawlers Association – Cape Cod Commercial Fishermen’s Alliance – Cordova District Fishermen United Fishermen’s Marketing Association – Fishing Vessel Owners’ Association – Fort Bragg Groundfish Association – Georges Bank Fixed Gear Sector – Midwater Trawlers’ Cooperative – New Hampshire Community Seafood – North Pacific Fisheries Association – Purse Seine Vessel Owners’ Association – Rhode Island Commercial Fishermen’s Association – South Atlantic Fishermen’s Association – United Catcher Boats

Oral Testimony of Robert E. (Bob) Dooley Before House Committee on National Resources Water, Oceans, and Wildlife Subcommittee, May 1, 2019

May 6, 2019 - Published in News Releases and Advocacy,Policy

Chairman Huffman, Ranking Member McClintock, and Members of the Subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to testify before you today regarding the State of our nation’s fisheries.

My name is Bob Dooley. I am a lifelong commercial fisherman from Half Moon Bay, California and a member of the board of directors of Seafood Harvesters of America. Seafood Harvesters is a national commercial fishing association comprised of 17 member-organizations that represent a variety of fisheries on every coast. I am also a member of the Pacific Fishery Management Council, but I am not here today in that role.

Over the past 40 years, we have come a long way in the management of our nation’s fisheries for their long-term sustainability. We owe this success in large part to the management principles established in the Magnuson Stevens Act (MSA). In 2013, when I last testified before the House Natural Resources Committee, I stated that the MSA is an excellent piece of legislation. I stand by that statement today.

It is our foundational fisheries law and we ensure a plentiful and lasting seafood harvest through prioritizing the science-based management it prescribes.

For example, on the West Coast, the trawl fishery was declared an economic disaster in 2000 due to over-fishing brought on by the lack of accountability and unobserved regulatory discards. As a result, we had 10 groundfish species declared overfished. Many of these stocks carried a more than 45-year rebuilding schedule

With the 2011 implementation of 100 percent industry funded observer coverage, uncertainty was eliminated. As of last year, eight of those overfished species were declared completely rebuilt and none remain overfished. This is the result of full accountability and science-based management.

Secondly, I’d like to discuss the rising costs of observers in our commercial fisheries.

The need for a base level of human observer coverage in our fisheries is indisputable and supported by the Seafood Harvesters. However, as costs continue to rise—upwards of $500/day in our region—carrying observers on all vessels becomes an extreme economic burden, especially for smaller vessels.

Harvesters strongly believe in full accountability, but we think there is a scalable, more cost-effective way to achieve that.

Electronic Monitoring and integrated logbooks are showing great promise. Many pilot programs are proving to deliver cost-effective catch accounting tools. It is critically important that while regulations are being developed governing their use, that we are keenly aware of the cost associated with their adoption. We should avoid prescribing a Cadillac when all we need is a Chevy.

Regardless of who pays the tab, industry or government, we must have a common goal of reducing costs while achieving a reasonable amount of certainty in our data and management.

Third, I’d like to talk about the impact climate change is having on our fisheries. Commercial fishermen will be the first to tell you about the changes they’ve seen on the water in recent years.

These changes are creating additional fishing restrictions and closures that cause significant economic losses.

We must recognize that fisheries are part of the ecosystem and the necessary resources must be provided for the industry to continue its mission to remain the front-line stewards of our marine resources. We can’t turn fisheries on and off and expect them, and the communities that rely on them, to remain viable.

I encourage Congress to support the work that the Councils and NOAA are doing to develop frameworks that will allow the industry to have the tools to adapt and manage their fishing practices in the face of climate change.

Lastly, I’d like to touch on NOAA funding. Without adjusting NOAA’s budget to keep up with the rising costs of facilities, labor, and program execution, the agency will be hamstrung and unable to carry out their core mission

As an example, on the West Coast we were recently informed by the National Marine Fisheries Service that 2 of the 4 contracted survey vessels will not be conducting surveys for the next two years due to budget shortfalls. This lack of survey data and the resulting uncertainty it produces will over time cost West Coast fisheries millions of dollars in lost jobs and fish production.

Our ability to feed good data into our stock assessments depends on having the resources to do so.

As I end my testimony here today I would leave you with this one thought. Each fishing vessel is a business. I’m here today because I want to see the long-term sustainability and growth of not just our fisheries resources, but also each business that operates on the water.

As Congress considers the state of fisheries today, I hope you will recognize the great successes we’ve achieved over the past decades, but also look to tackling some of the issues I’ve presented here.

Thank you.

Mr. Dooley’s written testimony as submitted to the Committee is available here.

Written testimony of Robert E. Dooley, Board Member, Seafood Harvesters of America as Submitted to House Committee on National Resources Water, Oceans, and Wildlife Subcommittee, May 1, 2019

May 1, 2019 - Published in News Releases and Advocacy

Chairman Huffman, Ranking Member McClintock, and Members of the Subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to testify before you today regarding the state of U.S. fisheries. My name is Bob Dooley. I am here today in my capacity as a lifelong commercial fisherman along the West Coast and in Alaska, and as a Board Member of the Seafood Harvesters of America. I was recently appointed by the Secretary of Commerce to serve as a California representative on the Pacific Fishery Management Council, but will not be representing my work in that capacity.

I have lived in Half Moon Bay, CA my entire life and was a commercial fisherman for more than 40 years before recently retiring. My family has been active in commercial fishing and its supporting businesses on the West Coast for more than 70 years. Over the course of my fishing career, I have owned and operated several fishing vessels with my brother, John, including vessels in the Bering Sea Pollock and Pacific Cod fisheries, the West Coast Pacific Whiting fishery, and the Dungeness Crab fishery.

The Seafood Harvesters of America is a national commercial fishing organization with 17 member organizations participating in fisheries off every coast. We are focused on federal fisheries policy and committed to the stewardship of fisheries resources and accountability in our nation’s fishing industry.

I would like to begin my testimony by stating that in the past 40 years, we, as a fishing industry, have made enormous strides in the management of our fisheries resources for their long-term sustainability, thanks in large part to management principles established in the Magnuson Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA). Through its successive reauthorizations, industry-supported changes were made to ensure that not only are the fish stocks responsibly managed, but that our businesses are profitable and we are able to provide consumers access to one of the greatest sources of renewable protein: wild caught seafood. We owe the current success of our nation’s fisheries to the forethought of our predecessors who had the wherewithal to include conservative guardrails in the last reauthorization.

As we look to the future of our U.S. fisheries, we must be mindful of our history of overfishing and prevent a return to those days. We must recognize the current success of our fisheries and stand proud as the global leader in supplying sustainable seafood to consumers around the country and abroad. And, we must prepare for the changes in our marine environment as the climate continues to change. To that end, I’d like to focus my testimony on the following issues:

  1. The success of the MSA
  2. Rising Observer Program costs
  3. Climate change impacts on fisheries
  4. NOAA funding

The Success of the MSA

The Magnuson Stevens Act is an excellent piece of legislation. I stated this last time I testified before the House Natural Resources Committee in 2013, and I stand by this statement today.

MSA is our nation’s foundational fisheries law and we ensure a plentiful and lasting seafood harvest for this country through the science-based management system it prescribes. We don’t need massive changes to the law; rather, we need to work on the interpretation and implementation of the existing law.

When we put accountability at the center of our fishing practices and the management of our fish stocks, we make economic success possible. When we ensure the long-term sustainability and growth of our fish stocks by using science-based management measures, we are able to grow both the commercial and recreational fishing industries.

We have seen the success of the MSA in a number of regions, but I want to touch on one in particular that is close to my heart.

I grew up fishing for West Coast groundfish. My family was a fishing family, so it was the natural path for me. Before I was allowed to work on boats, I worked with my older brother, John, in my mom’s restaurant and crab stand while my dad went out to fish. My uncle was a commercial fish buyer and a recreational charter boat operator – we all worked the restaurant, the docks, and the boats in support of the family business.

The summer I turned 11, I got my first fishing job on the back deck of the Monterey Clipper and I never looked back. After that summer, my brother and I started a lifelong partnership, starting off trawling in the West Coast Groundfish fishery in the “Wild West” days of fishing. There wasn’t a lot of fisheries management back then, and certainly not at all how we think of it today. This was before catch limits were even contemplated; we had no sense of how much fish we were taking out of the water. Even in the late 70s, we could sense the declining catch rates in the groundfish fishery. But it wasn’t until the 1990s that we put the pieces together: the groundfish complex (includes many rockfish species, flounder, sablefish, and sole) was so overfished that we knew we had to nearly halt fishing. In 2000, the fishery was declared a disaster and the Pacific Council implemented severe catch restrictions; catch limits were so low it wasn’t even worth going out for these fish.

Fast forward to last fall. NOAA announced that many of the West Coast groundfish complex species had recovered ahead of their rebuilding timelines and as a result, the Agency proposed increased catch limits for a number of species (these went into effect at the beginning of this year). NOAA originally proposed a 45+ year rebuilding timeline for the long-lived rockfish species in this complex, but in less than 10 years, many of these species have been declared recovered. The last two species left on the rebuilding list will likely be taken off next year after the next stock assessment.

Significantly higher quotas for a number of groundfish species means an estimated $60 million increase in fishing income for commercial fishermen across the three West Coast states and an increase in the variety of fish available to consumers in grocery stores and restaurants throughout the region. This fishery is now also MSC-certified, providing consumer confidence in the sustainability and harvest practices of this fishery. And on top of all this, it is estimated that the increase in quota means upwards of an additional 200,000 recreational fishing trips each year in Southern California.

This recovery was the result of following the letter and the spirit of the MSA. Commercial fishermen, processors, and coastal communities made sacrifices, but we knew it was the right thing to do. The fish stocks were hurting and our catches were dwindling. Industry worked with NOAA and we trusted their science to put us on the road to rebuilding the groundfish fishery and here we are today — we’ve grown the pie so all sectors benefit.

There are some who want to argue for reauthorizing Magnuson to better address the differences in the commercial and recreational fishing industries and we agree, there are important differences. So, let’s have that conversation about how to better manage recreational fisheries. But, that conversation does not mean we need to change the core principles of MSA. We should be looking towards improving the science and the catch accounting in the recreational sector rather than removing accountability measures and regard for the health of our stocks.

The core conservation tenants of the MSA are proven. MSA is working as we intended it to work. Sure, we can work on the implementation of certain parts of the law, but I hope that if you take away one thing from my testimony today, it’s that we’re seeing results. As we improve data collection through innovative technologies and methods, as we improve accountability in all sectors, and as we continue to base our fisheries management on science, we will continue to see positive results.

When we are able to maintain the health of our fish stocks, every sector benefits and we can help ensure the long-term sustainability of our fisheries resources and our businesses.

Rising Observer Program Costs

For the commercial fishing industry across the country, the rising cost of observers is a big concern. And, it’s a concern for NOAA, as well, because they are still paying for human observers in some regions.

Commercial fishermen are committed to getting NOAA the observer data they require and need in order to manage our fisheries. However, as costs continue to rise, upwards of $500/day in some regions and fisheries, carrying these observers becomes an economic hardship, especially for small boats.

We think there’s a better way and we have been working tirelessly with NOAA and industry partners over the past decade to develop and implement electronic technologies for monitoring and reporting our catch data. Employing electronic monitoring and reporting systems on our commercial vessels has the potential to significantly reduce costs for vessel owners and improve data transmission to NOAA.

The prevalence and scale of pilot projects is indicative of the commitment from the industry, from NOAA, and from the private sector to help these electronic technologies succeed. Indeed, there are electronic monitoring pilot projects around the country, including several on the West Coast. Specifically, United Catcher Boats and Midwater Trawlers Cooperative have received an Exempted Fishing Permit, or EFP, from NOAA that allows for the use of EM systems onboard mid-water trawl boats fishing for Whiting to monitor and estimate the number and amount of discards in the Whiting fishery. This program has benefited fishermen in the Whiting fishery by reducing costs considerably ($576,956 in savings in 2015) and eliminating the problems that accompany human observers including scheduling and obtaining an at-sea human observer, and having to house and feed them onboard vessel with limited space. In the future, we hope that NOAA can more fully use these videos to inform catch accounting and stock assessments.

When working to implement EM, we’ve seen some great successes, but we’ve also run into a few problems. We’ve seen NOAA put off implementation of EM technologies because they are trying to build the Cadillac of electronic systems when all we really need is a Chevy workhorse. And in fact, we have built that Chevy in a number of pilot projects and proven its abilities. What we are tackling now is working with the agency to understand how we can help them fully utilize the electronic systems and data in a more efficient, real-time way to inform the management of our stocks.

At the Pacific Council, we are working with NOAA to determine how to pay for the costs associated with EM. Traditionally, the industry in this region has covered the costs of observers and we’re willing to continue covering these costs, but we are concerned that if NOAA has a blank check from the industry, they will add zeros to the cost and we’ll end up with a Cadillac system in 10 years instead of the Chevy in 12 months. We should be working to develop and implement fishery-specific systems that get NOAA the data they need, not necessarily that they want.

Tied into the cost of these systems are the issues of data storage and data review. Industry has been working with NOAA to try to determine a workable solution for both sides so that NOAA has access to the data they need for a reasonable amount of time, while the industry doesn’t end up paying for years’ worth of unnecessary storage. Additionally, the issue of data review, particularly who reviews the data and who pays for the review, must still be addressed. On the West Coast, industry will likely pay for data review, but NOAA is concerned that because industry is paying for the review, it may be biased. Our concern is that NOAA will then require industry to pay for a third-party audit of the review, adding an additional financial burden on the industry. Clearly, we still have a few things to work out with the Agency and we are willing to work with them to find common-sense solutions, but regardless of who pays the tab—industry or government—we must have a common goal of reducing costs while achieving a reasonable amount of certainty in our data and management.

Electronic technologies have the ability to vastly improve fisheries management—EM can be more reliable, cost-effective, and scalable. Additionally, EM has the ability to increase monitoring coverage and improve data robustness, helping to reduce uncertainty and improve the effectiveness and efficiency of fisheries management. As an industry, we need to use our vessels as platforms of opportunity to aid in the ultimate goal of improving management while reducing costs to the industry and to NOAA.

Climate change impacts on fisheries

Commercial fishermen are some of the first to tell you about the changes on the water in recent years as our oceans respond to a changing climate. On the West Coast, we’ve seen whales move closer to shore as their food source migrates landward, shellfish farms are having to adjust the pH of the water in which they’re growing, and we’ve seen a rise in levels of domoic acid in our Dungeness crab fishery. These impacts, and others, affect our ability to find, catch, and supply markets and consumers with fresh seafood.

To help the industry respond and adapt to some of these changes, the Pacific Fishery Management Council recently formed the Climate and Communities Core Team (Ad Hoc CCCT) to “manage a scenario planning exercise on the topic of shifting stock availability (including shifting distribution) across species, FMPs, and communities across the west coast” (PFMC website, 2019). The goal of this ad hoc committee is not necessarily to prescribe outcomes, because we may not know what those outcomes will be, but to develop a framework, tools, and products to help our region more readily respond to the changes we’re seeing on the water. I am hopeful that the committee’s report this September will prove fruitful and productive.

The work that the Ad Hoc CCCT is doing, as well as the work happening elsewhere at the Council, and the local, state, and regional levels, is a result of the accountability in our fisheries over the past decades. We have a much better idea of what’s going on in our fisheries, so we are able to quickly identify changes and variabilities in our fisheries. As we continue to monitor and track our fisheries and ocean conditions, we will be able to better model and predict future changes and then manage our fishing behavior appropriately.

Earlier this year, the California Dungeness crab fishery was forced to shut down due to interactions with whales. Changes in the ocean brought the bait closer to shore, which also brought the whales closer to shore where crab pots are set, this combined with season delays due to domoic acid present in certain areas, created the perfect storm for whale interactions with crab pots. The industry recognized the problem and sat down at the table with regulators and NGOs to come up with a solution. But before we were able to come to a workable solution, a lawsuit shut the fishery down.

In the Bering Sea, changes in the ice edge formation may have impacts on the productivity of the system and pollock stocks in the area. Water temperature and ice formations have changed over the past few years in the Bering Sea and the ice edge that normally forms on the Bering Sea shelf as a result of the frigid wind from the north, has not formed the last two years. Researchers are working to better understand if this ice edge, not just the upwelling that happens in these waters, helps to fuel the primary productivity that feeds the system and aggregates these huge schools of fish. Questions, like “Will the fish aggregations move to find more productive waters? Does pollock recruitment suffer? What tools are necessary to prepare for such changes?”, are just a few of the questions researchers are asking.

The West Coast isn’t alone in managing fishing gear interactions, disease outbreaks, and changing ocean temperatures and chemistry. Fishermen across the country are witnessing changes on and in the water. What we’d like to see across the country isn’t lawsuits and their resulting fishery closures, but collaborative research and partnerships to help add to the growing body of science and research that will help the fishing industry better respond to the changes we’re witnessing. The changes witnessed are new and they don’t always happen regularly. We need to be in the business of watching these changes, gathering data, researching, and modeling with the aim to develop the tools to help the industry productively deal with and adapt to the changes.

We must recognize that fisheries are part of the ecosystem. We must provide the resources and the tools for the industry to continue its business and to remain the frontline stewards of our marine resources. We can’t turn fisheries on and off and expect them, and the communities that rely on them, to remain viable.

I am hopeful that the Ad Hoc CCCT can identify what tools we are missing out on the West Coast to be able to be responsive to the changes in our marine environment so that we can continue to fish without detriment to other organisms. And I hope other Councils continue their important work on researching and better understanding the changes occurring off our coasts.

I encourage Congress to support the work Councils and NOAA are doing to develop processes and frameworks so that our fishing industry can better respond and adapt to what’s happening in and on our waters. By providing the resources necessary, you are signaling strong support for the science and the work done by our fishery management councils and NOAA, and empowering them to ensure our stocks are as healthy as they can be. In return, our businesses are able to continue to grow and support our coastal communities, and to provide quality domestic seafood to consumers across the country.

NOAA Funding

I recognize this is not an appropriations hearing, but I would be remiss if I did not, at the very least, mention the interconnectedness of good fisheries management and NOAA funding. NOAA funding is at the heart of the success of our nation’s fisheries management system. Put simply, without adjusting NOAA’s budget to keep up with facilities, labor, and program costs, the Agency is hamstrung and cannot carry out their core mission and functions.

The FY20 budget proposed by the President last month represents a nearly 18% cut across NOAA’s discretionary budget from FY19 enacted levels. A similar percentage cut is proposed for NMFS’s FY20 budget. Without adequately funding NOAA, we fail to equip the agency with the resources it needs to conduct research, gather data, and run models in order to make informed, responsible management decisions.

Tightening budgets at NMFS have real impacts on the Agency’s ability to carry out parts of its core mission. Look at the North Pacific region, for example. Here, surveys for targeted species have historically occurred annually. These annual surveys are critical for the effective management of fish stocks in the region, providing managers with robust data used to set the catch limits in those fisheries for the following fishing year. These surveys significantly contribute to some of the most well-managed fisheries in our country. However, at recent Council meetings, there have been discussions examining how to prioritize which stocks are surveyed each year because NOAA may not have the funding to keep up with the number of bottom trawl and midwater acoustic trawl surveys necessary to cover each targeted species annually. NOAA typically uses four vessels to complete these surveys, but one of their ships, the Oscar Dyson, has been out of commission and unable to conduct surveys. To make matters worse, survey tracts have historically been 10 nautical miles (nm) apart, but because NMFS can’t afford the ship time, the tracts are being widened to 20 nm — so that means we’re halving the data NOAA receives from these critical surveys. We’re short-changing science, hamstringing our scientists and managers, and hindering our ability to conduct timely, robust stock assessments.

This, in turn, increases uncertainty and causes lower annual allocations to account for this uncertainty. Those fish are there, but withheld from the fishery, causing economic losses in the industry and to the nation, not to mention, a lower availability of quality seafood.

We’re seeing a similar trend on the West Coast. At the last Pacific Council meeting, we were informed that two out of our four survey vessels will be eliminated for the next two years. Again, we’re seeing the research capacity of NMFS cut in half. At this same Council meeting, the SSC announced that the sigma value, the scientific uncertainty buffer built into catch limits, will increase because our surveys are outdated. In the past, we’ve been able to deal with the buffer built into our catch limits because we had the vessels and the resources to conduct timely stock assessments. But as NOAA’s budget flatlines or worse, shrinks, and they are unable to repair damaged vessels or update their technologies, our ability to fish takes a hit. The Council will have to add up to a 20% buffer to catch limits for stocks with assessments older than 10 years.

That hurts our businesses and our communities. NMFS’s primary job is science. Surveys and stock assessments are arguably the most critical thing NMFS does. They are the lifeblood of our fisheries and our businesses. Without adequate funding, we will be operating under uncertainty and poor science.

In 2017, NOAA completed its largest single-year total of stock assessments, including 31 first- assessments on mostly data-limited reef species (NOAA website, 2019). NOAA’s budget that year was $1.2 billion more than what the President’s budget proposes. If we want to grow the Blue Economy and have the growth based on real science and research, we cannot afford to hamstring the agency responsible for managing the resources on which the Blue Economy depends.

I have heard Members on both sides of the aisle and fishermen who fish for sport and for their livelihoods all say that when there is good science on the front end, we see good management results on the back end. I wholeheartedly agree. But our ability to feed good data into our management systems around the country depends on having the resources to do so. It is critical to fully fund NOAA. Without continued robust investments, we will see our management systems begin to fail not only for our resource management responsibilities, but ultimately for the businesses and communities who rely on those healthy fishery resources.

Conclusion

Each fishing vessel is a business. I’m here today because I want to see the long-term sustainability and growth of not just our fisheries resources, but each business that operates on the water. Fisheries in the U.S. are rebuilding and beginning to do well thanks in large part to a strong Magnuson Stevens Act, and we’ve come a long way since the MSA was first passed in 1976. We’ve come a long way from the days of overcapitalization, overfishing, and crashing fish stocks. We’ve rebuilt 42 stocks and many more are on the way to being rebuilt. We are expanding access to fish for commercial and recreational anglers. Most importantly, healthy, sustainable seafood is widely available to U.S. consumers.

Looking ahead, we have many opportunities to build on the successes we’ve seen in our fisheries. With improvements in electronic technologies on fishing vessels, we have the opportunity to provide more accountable, robust, and affordable data to fishery managers in near real-time to aid in more efficient analysis and management of our stocks. With the development of climate change frameworks and tools, fishery managers can better adapt their management recommendations and our businesses will have the opportunity to withstand changing ocean conditions. With good investments at NOAA, the agency will have the resources it needs to responsibly and sustainably manage our nation’s fisheries resources under the MSA. Maintaining the core principles established under Magnuson will ensure our fisheries resources and the businesses that depend on healthy fish stocks will continue long into the future.

1 2 3 11